Sujet : Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?)
De : 186283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (186282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 17. Jan 2025, 07:01:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : wokiesux
Message-ID : <CaadnYrkutW9bxT6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 1/16/25 9:39 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 16/01/2025 11:27, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2025-01-16, 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
>
Someone from Pink Floyd once commented that the reason
their music sounded so "different" was mostly because
their skills with their instruments was initially SO
poor - they COULDN'T emulate the popular bands :-)
>
I heard that Queen's distinctive guitar sound came from
the fact that the only guitar and amp that Brian May
could originally afford was a cheap piece of crap.
No. He (and his dad) built his own guitar, but I think the pickups were P90s. The amp was always a (number of) Vox AC30(s), well known for a unique sound due to stuff you wouldn't be interested in
Hey, we're tekkies here - we're interested in lots
of stuff :-)
From May's sound, it's clear the amp has a somewhat
exaggerated higher-end response with some interesting
harmonics. A lot of the older transistor amps had
a kinda 'hard' sound too and kinda heavier on the
odd harmonics. Dunno if that was inherent, or
by-design - intentionally emulating the AC30 sound.
The Pink Floyd story IS interesting though. They
were kinda good MUSICIANS, but kinda CRAP with
their chosen instruments. Created something very
different from the usual mix ..... I wonder if
an 'AI' would have done the same, or striven
for technical accuracy above all else ?