Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:Heh heh ... then I guess I was a Real Man right up
It is a powerful way to do it! =)Good stuff! I replicate between two countries for added resilience. Both rsync and restic work great backing up to a tor hidden service. To speed things up, the first backup can be done locally, and after that, only deltas are sent from around the world.>
That's how we do it.
Often you need just a few files from backup, ones somebodyWith restic you can do it from the client, or, you can mount the backup and
navigate the file tree to get any files you like from the server. I've tried the
server mount and it worked well, without any surprises. You can of course do
full restores as well to a separate folder on the client and move what you like.
oopsied, so huge zip archives can be a negative. OpenSSLLet me know if you find any weaknesses.
works fast for encryption and the Winders version has
almost exactly the same params. GPG is not so good in
the file-by-file thing because it has a relatively
long start-up time.
>
Have never used restic, I'll have to give it a look.
Another way to back up is to 'fork' every file writeAt the dawn of time we used to setup replication between storage systems, then
to another, maybe even remote, drive. SoftRAID seems
to know just what's being written but I've never
figured out exactly how that works. The idea would
be to feed the full file path/name of what's just
been writ/modified into a (de-duplicated) list for
some daemon or whatever to dupe to yer destination -
local or cloud. This would be very quick and not bother
the other gazillion unchanged files.
snapshot the replica at various times per day, and for extra security, write out
the snapshots to tape for off site storage. That was backups for real men!!
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.