Re: M$ 365 Down, Again

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

On Mon, 3 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:

 Zeps are technically "better", but the framework
 is subject to stress and can snap - even if it
 was upgraded to titanium. Blimps spread the load
 across the entire envelope and can thus survive
 sudden wind gusts better. They may kinda fold
 and shimmy, but don't snap.
>
 Hmmmm ... maybe a 'hybrid' is possible now -
 a blimp, but 'stiffened' a bit with like
 graphite ribs so it's not SO floppy ?

 
I heard about an experimental concept that does not use a gas for lift,
but vacuum! Very fascinating!

More theoretical than experimental - the materials might be
possible but I don't think anyone can make them yet.

--
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#