Sujet : Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
De : gay (at) *nospam* sfuu.ca (Ian)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 05. Feb 2025, 08:54:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <vnv5fs$1lter$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : KNode/0.10.9
WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 2/4/25 4:02 PM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Zeps are technically "better", but the framework
is subject to stress and can snap - even if it
was upgraded to titanium. Blimps spread the load
across the entire envelope and can thus survive
sudden wind gusts better. They may kinda fold
and shimmy, but don't snap.
>
Hmmmm ... maybe a 'hybrid' is possible now -
a blimp, but 'stiffened' a bit with like
graphite ribs so it's not SO floppy ?
>
I heard about an experimental concept that does not use a gas for
lift, but vacuum! Very fascinating!
More theoretical than experimental - the materials might be
possible but I don't think anyone can make them yet.
Um, no, CAN'T be made. Ever SEEN any kind of vac
vessel even slightly compromised ? INSTANT total
CRUSH. Maybe an unobtanium sphere .....
I think the trick is to cleverly combine hydrogen
and helium lift. Envision hydrogen cells - but
INSIDE a helium envelope. Reduces fire risk to
near zero but you STILL gain some lift.
29-2 is not a big gain over 29-4. Who needs the complication?
-- *********** To reply by e-mail, make w single in address ************** 
M$ 365 Down, Again
Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
