Sujet : Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
De : not (at) *nospam* telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 06. Feb 2025, 21:28:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net
Message-ID : <67a51b61@news.ausics.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.31 (i586))
The Natural Philosopher <
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 06/02/2025 03:19, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Anyway, sorry, I just CAN'T see any sort of useful
and safe vacuum blimp. One goose bumps into the
thing and it will all implode in an instant.
This is substantially correct. The strength to weigh ratio of a vacuum
filled blimp or dirigible means it probably cannot exist at any useable
size
If you can make small vacuum balls that float in the air, you
could potentially fill a blimp with them instead of gas. Or
instead of one hollow vacuum chamber, join the balls (or honeycomb
segments) up into one solid lighter-than-air structure of tiny
sealed vacuum chambers where only the outer ones are vulnerable
to impact.
-- __ __#_ < |\| |< _#
M$ 365 Down, Again
Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
