Re: M$ 365 Down, Again

On 2/7/25 12:39 AM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote:

On 2/6/25 3:28 PM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On 06/02/2025 03:19, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:

Anyway, sorry, I just CAN'T see any sort of useful
     and safe vacuum blimp. One goose bumps into the
     thing and it will all implode in an instant.
>

This is substantially correct. The strength to weigh ratio of a vacuum
filled  blimp or dirigible means it probably cannot exist at any useable
size

>
If you can make small vacuum balls that float in the air, you
could potentially fill a blimp with them instead of gas. Or
instead of one hollow vacuum chamber, join the balls (or honeycomb
segments) up into one solid lighter-than-air structure of tiny
sealed vacuum chambers where only the outer ones are vulnerable
to impact.

>
>
   But ONE little dent compromising the structural
   integrity and ......

 And the rest of the sealed balls/segments still keep the thing up,
that was my point.

   But they WON'T ... implosions can be quite violent.
   If one goes it'll be a chain reaction.