Re: M$ 365 Down, Again

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: M$ 365 Down, Again
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 07. Feb 2025, 18:38:44
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m0mup4Fakt5U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Hmm2; b3261289; Linux-6.13.1)
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:19:34 -0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote
in <vo5bqm$3io04$1@dont-email.me>:

Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote:
WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
On 2/6/25 3:28 PM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 06/02/2025 03:19, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Anyway, sorry, I just CAN'T see any sort of useful and safe vacuum
blimp.  One goose bumps into the thing and it will all implode in
an instant.
>
This is substantially correct.  The strength to weigh ratio of a
vacuum filled blimp or dirigible means it probably cannot exist at
any useable size
 
If you can make small vacuum balls that float in the air, you could
potentially fill a blimp with them instead of gas.  Or instead of one
hollow vacuum chamber, join the balls (or honeycomb segments) up into
one solid lighter-than-air structure of tiny sealed vacuum chambers
where only the outer ones are vulnerable to impact.
 
 
  But ONE little dent compromising the structural integrity and ......
 
And the rest of the sealed balls/segments still keep the thing up,
that was my point.
 
Unless the explosive collapse of the one sealed ball/segment impacts the
integrety of adjacent segments such that some number greater than one of
them also then explosively collapses.  At which point you have a runaway
chain reaction that might take out a significant number of the
balls/segments before it fizzles out.

Would I be speaking out of turn to say that the
whole idea just plain sucks? /s

Seriously, though:  the materials to keep the environment out
of the vacuum vessels are going to be too flimsy for safe lift.
Consider a picture tube of yore:  it does not float, and that's
already pretty flimsy.

BTW, tried Linux 6.14-rc1 a couple of days ago -- couldn't get
an NVIDIA binary blob to build on it, or I'd be running it
now...for Science!

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.13.1 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "Space is an illusion, disk space doubly so."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 Jan 25 * M$ 365 Down, Again91WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
30 Jan 25 +- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
30 Jan 25 `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again89Andy Burns
30 Jan 25  +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again86The Natural Philosopher
30 Jan 25  i+* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again84D
31 Jan 25  ii`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again83Carlos E.R.
31 Jan 25  ii +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again4WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
31 Jan 25  ii i+* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2D
1 Feb 25  ii ii`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
1 Feb 25  ii i`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1Andy Burns
31 Jan 25  ii `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again78D
1 Feb 25  ii  `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again77rbowman
1 Feb 25  ii   +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
1 Feb 25  ii   i`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1Carlos E.R.
1 Feb 25  ii   +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again73D
1 Feb 25  ii   i+* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again70Carlos E.R.
1 Feb 25  ii   ii+* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again7D
1 Feb 25  ii   iii`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again6Carlos E.R.
2 Feb 25  ii   iii `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again5D
2 Feb 25  ii   iii  `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again4rbowman
2 Feb 25  ii   iii   +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2The Natural Philosopher
2 Feb 25  ii   iii   i`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
2 Feb 25  ii   iii   `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
1 Feb 25  ii   ii`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again62rbowman
1 Feb 25  ii   ii +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again53Lars Poulsen
2 Feb 25  ii   ii i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again52D
2 Feb 25  ii   ii i +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again11Lars Poulsen
2 Feb 25  ii   ii i i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again10D
2 Feb 25  ii   ii i i `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again9Lars Poulsen
3 Feb 25  ii   ii i i  +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again4D
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i  i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again3WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i  i +- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1rbowman
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i  i `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
3 Feb 25  ii   ii i i  `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again4D
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i   `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again3rbowman
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    +- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1The Natural Philosopher
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
3 Feb 25  ii   ii i +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again24WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
3 Feb 25  ii   ii i i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again23D
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again22WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i  `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again21D
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i i   `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again20Computer Nerd Kev
5 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again18WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
5 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i+- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1Ian
5 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again16Carlos E.R.
6 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again15WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
6 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again11The Natural Philosopher
6 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  i+* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again9Computer Nerd Kev
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  ii`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again8WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  ii +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again5Computer Nerd Kev
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  ii i+* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  ii ii`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1Computer Nerd Kev
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  ii i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2Rich
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  ii i `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1vallor
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  ii `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2D
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  ii  `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1The Natural Philosopher
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  i`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
6 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i  `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again3Carlos E.R.
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i   `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    i    `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
5 Feb 25  ii   ii i i    `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
3 Feb 25  ii   ii i `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again16John Ames
3 Feb 25  ii   ii i  +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again6Carlos E.R.
3 Feb 25  ii   ii i  i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again5D
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i  i +- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1rbowman
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i  i `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again3The Natural Philosopher
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i  i  +- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1Carlos E.R.
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i  i  `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
3 Feb 25  ii   ii i  `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again9D
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i   +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again3WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i   i+- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1rbowman
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i   i`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i   +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again4WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
6 Feb 25  ii   ii i   i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again3WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
6 Feb 25  ii   ii i   i `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
7 Feb 25  ii   ii i   i  `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
4 Feb 25  ii   ii i   `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
2 Feb 25  ii   ii `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again8D
2 Feb 25  ii   ii  +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2rbowman
2 Feb 25  ii   ii  i`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
3 Feb 25  ii   ii  `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again5WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
3 Feb 25  ii   ii   +* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again3WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
3 Feb 25  ii   ii   i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2The Natural Philosopher
3 Feb 25  ii   ii   i `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
3 Feb 25  ii   ii   `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
1 Feb 25  ii   i`* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2rbowman
2 Feb 25  ii   i `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1D
1 Feb 25  ii   `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1Carlos E.R.
31 Jan 25  i`- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1Andy Burns
30 Jan 25  `* Re: M$ 365 Down, Again2WokieSux282@ud0s4.net
30 Jan 25   `- Re: M$ 365 Down, Again1Andy Burns

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal