Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
De : WokieSux283 (at) *nospam* ud0s4.net (WokieSux282@ud0s4.net)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 11. Feb 2025, 00:31:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : WokieSux
Message-ID : <9RycneStTKjZETf6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 2/10/25 1:40 PM, candycanearter07 wrote:
D <nospam@example.net> wrote at 21:19 this Saturday (GMT):
[snip]
My most powerful software was a multi-path checker to a storage system
that held a lot of pension money.
>
It was written in bash. =D
>
Ok, ok... I wrote a GUI for some kind of batch job mgmt software that IBM
hobbled together in order to trace dependencies, that was done in python.
[snip]
Did you use something like tkinter?
TKinter works. Not ultra-elegant but functional.
I've used it for several projects with pop-up
windows and touch-screens and such. Did find that
you get less grief if you don't CLOSE those windows
but just send 'em off to negative screen coords.
Then on signal from a touch-screen or timer or
whatever you just drag 'em back into view and
make whatever updates.
TK is also pretty well documented since it's been
around for awhile. Actually none of the graphics
toolkits are particularly 'elegant' or great joys
to use so go with what seems easiest for the job.
Mostly if I need something with a quickie GUI then
I use Lazarus/FPC when possible. The WYSIWYG form
builder with a zillion possible options is WAY nicer
than the line-at-a-time TK approach plus Pascal looks
much nicer than Python or 'C'.