Sujet : Re: where the PDP-8 came from, not The joy of FORTRAN
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 27. Feb 2025, 05:42:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpoqgb$2vn0a$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 01:39:07 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
If you look at the 18 bit PDP-4 you'll find one's complement ADD and
two's complenent TAD.
Just in the middle of reading that DEC “Computer Engineering>" book.
Gordon Bell admitted that having both 1’s-complement (a hangover from the
PDP-1) and 2’s-complement arithmetic in the PDP-4 was a mistake; later 18-
bit machines dropped the 1s-complement support.
The 18 bit machines could address all of memory directly ...
That would have required 18-bit addresses, leaving no room for any actual
opcodes or addressing modifiers in an 18-bit instruction word.