Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 28. Feb 2025, 13:26:40
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <3XCdnVK8WegeNlz6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 2/28/25 2:34 AM, rbowman wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 01:39:11 -0500, c186282 wrote:
8 bits kinda emerged with microprocessors. Likely reflected what was
practical to do on the chip real-estate plus industry competition.
8008 and then everything was 8 bits. The popularity of the Z80 kinda
cemented it.
Makes you wonder what would have happened when Intel designed the 4004 if
it wasn't for a calculator where BCD fit neatly into a nibble.
Hmmmm ... COULD have been the 5005 or 6006 :-)
Would have been NICE if all those old microprocessors
used 12 bits instead of 8, would have made a lot of
stuff easier to code. 0-255 ain't much to work with.
But I still think the 8008 set the standard.
And yea, there was only SO much they could
cram onto those old chip dies, and 8-bit
stuff was probably the limit early on.
A lot of mini-computers were 16 bit around the
time microprocessors came out, so "half a mini"
maybe kinda sounded logical.
Should be a fair number of the decision-makers
from the 60s-70s still alive. If anybody knows
some, ASK.