Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 28. Feb 2025, 21:50:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpt7j0$3r2n0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:42:57 -0700, Peter Flass wrote:
I used to be able to crank out assembler mostly as fast as I could write
(or type), with some thought required for the tricky bits. C is not
really faster for me to write, or wasn’t when I was doing a bunch of
it.
But a line of C typically does a whole lot more than a line of assembler.
That is where the productivity gain comes from.
Fred Brooks, author of the classic “The Mythical Man-Month”, worked this
out years ago: once a code base reaches a certain size, your typical
experienced programmer, familiar with the project, is only able to
contribute about ten lines of reasonably-debugged code per day. And that
applies across a whole range of different languages.
This is why very-high-level languages, which can do a whole lot more in a
single line of code, offer greater productivity than assembler.