Sujet : Re: evolution of bytes, The joy of FORTRAN
De : johnl (at) *nospam* taugh.com (John Levine)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 03. Mar 2025, 04:01:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Taughannock Networks
Message-ID : <vq361c$cbc$2@gal.iecc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
According to Ted Nolan <tednolan> <tednolan>:
In article <vq2j3r$v1q6$2@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 20:34:09 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
>
S/360 brought us the addressable 8 bit byte packaged into 16 bit
halfwords and 32 bit words, using the same addressing for each.
>
Did any machine offer “byte” addressability with “byte” having
any meaning
other than “8-bit quantity”?
>
As late as the last half of the 1980s, we ran some network operations
on a BB&N C-70 machine with 10 bit bytes.
Good point, I'd forgotten about it. It was a C-30 with two extra bits in
each byte to increase the address space from 16 to 20 bits.
I talked to one of the developers who told me with considerable frustration
how much C code implicitly assumed 8 bit bytes. Well, duh.
-- Regards,John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly