Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:Indeed. Last time I looked, I thought 'I would never have thought of doing it THAT way, that's naffin' clever!'On 3/2/25 4:42 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:I always like to read the ASM, when it’s readable. I like to wonder “if IOn 02/03/2025 06:59, c186282 wrote:>What's the point in writing complex code if, atEspecially since a modern optimising compiler will turn it into
the first need, you basically have to totally
re-write the entire damned thing ???
unreadably complex assembler anyway - no need for the programmer to do it
Focus on readability with clear comments and a good result, not being
'clever'
>
Well, I'm not gonna be reading the ASM - just the 'C' :-)
>
code it THIS way, what do I get?” Sometimes “optimizations” are not quite
what you expect.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.