Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : peter_flass (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Peter Flass)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 03. Mar 2025, 21:15:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <2069461510.762725464.185189.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
rbowman <
bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:24:04 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 03/03/2025 10:05, Niklas Karlsson wrote:
Some would probably get on your case for being profligate with vertical
space... but honestly, it doesn't much matter with the kind of screen
real estate we have these days. I do agree that your style has
readability benefits.
Yes. Back in the day when I debugged with 80 column dot matrix
printouts, it got messy.
To day with collapsible blocks on a gui it's a lot easier
I still prefer statements that don't exceed 80 columns.
I keep them that way, too. It’s a bit harder to follow across longer lines.
That’s one reason I really miss the 3290. There was an optional full-width
dotted underscore line that could follow the cursor up and down. It made it
easy to read across a full 160-column line. I haven’t found an editor that
will do that.
-- Pete