Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 04. Mar 2025, 21:26:57
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m2p60hFi079U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:12:29 -0500, c186282 wrote:
Mostly we don't HAVE to use positional recs anymore since
memory/storage has increased so much. Wasn't always that way however
....
True, but the stuff lingers on. When the dinosaurs roamed the earth
someome used 'short' for an object number to save those precious bytes.
Whoda thunk there would ever be more than 32K objects in the system?
We gained a little headroom by going to 'unsigned short'. It was rare but,
surprise, there could be an attempt to create more than 64K objects.
But there we were with a struct that was the bedrock of the system
handcuffed by a decision in the '90s. Bump it to a unsigned int? Sure, and
affect every thing in the system including the databases.