Sujet : Re: The joy of FORTRAN
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : alt.folklore.computers comp.os.linux.miscDate : 25. Mar 2025, 05:47:27
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <Ed2cnQbx24D_qH_6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 3/24/25 7:07 AM, Thomas Prufer wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:05:11 -0500, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
>
Hmmmm ... betcha a 'hydraulic CPU' really could be made ...
>
Logic gates and amplifiers have been made
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluidics
Really NOT hard to make fluidic/hydraulic logic
gates. Simple valve/cylinders. AND/OR/NOR/XOR ...
even memory.
Which is kinda why I thought of a fully fluidic
digital CPU.
STILL think something like that would make a
great museum piece - under a few hundred square
feet of plexiglas flooring. Use colored fluids.
Allow patrons to add a few inputs and watch
them ripple through the CPU. Even a 4-bitter
would be 'educational' and really cool.
Now how do you make a fully-fluidic 'terminal'
display that'd run off that ???
MIT, with donations, built at least part of the
Babbage Difference Engine. I've seen vids - it's
just hypnotic to watch in action. Babbage DID
"have it" with his unaffordable Analytical Engine
and Lovelace saw the greater possibilities ...
but the brass-n-steel tech of the time alas .....
In any case, the hydraulic CPU ... what do you
figure ... 0.1 instructions-per-second ? :-)
Of course give it 100,000 years and .....
Also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MONIAC_Computer
I've seen stuff on the "Phillips Machine" before ...
though, really, it's more analog than digital. Still
kinda wonder why he made it using fluids rather than
existing analog techniques.