Re: Useless Use Of Regexes

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col misc 
Sujet : Re: Useless Use Of Regexes
De : mh+usenetspam1118 (at) *nospam* zugschl.us (Marc Haber)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 25. Mar 2025, 13:03:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details
Message-ID : <vru632$lb7$1@news1.tnib.de>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@usenet.mail.kapsi.fi> wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
>
Don’t forget the option of JSON-format output, for even easier processing
in scripts than messing around with regexes.
>
Kinda yes, but for a script I'd really like to just get the data
directly in an associative array that I can use as is. Instead of
messing around with jq. I just took a look around in Stack Exchange but
meh. One simplish bash example was this:
>
typeset -A myarray
>
while IFS== read -r key value; do
   myarray["$key"]="$value"
done < <(jq -r '.SITE_DATA | to_entries | .[] | .key + "=" + .value ' file.json)
>
But that still pukes if the data happens to have a numeric value and in
ip route output at least the metric value is numeric. So apparently it
needs to become .key + "=" + (.value|tostring) to handle that.

This is a classic example why shellscripts are inferior. If you had
written that in python, you could just ingest iproute's output in a
python data structire and access it naturally.

A very wise German person, today a friend of mine, used to say 25
years ago: "Verwende perl. Shell will man können, dann aber nicht
verwenden." In English that would be "Use Perl. You want to be able to
use Shell, but then don't use it." Today, of course, that would be
python.

Greetings
Marc
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE   |     Beginning of Wisdom "     |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 25 * Useless Use Of Regexes36Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes29Pancho
24 Mar 25 i+- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1The Natural Philosopher
24 Mar 25 i+* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes26Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Mar 25 ii+* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes3Marc Haber
26 Mar 25 iii`* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Mar 25 iii `- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1Marc Haber
25 Mar 25 ii+* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes21Anssi Saari
25 Mar 25 iii`* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes20Marc Haber
26 Mar 25 iii +* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Mar 25 iii i`* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes15Marc Haber
26 Mar 25 iii i `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes14Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Mar 25 iii i  +* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes12Marc Haber
27 Mar 25 iii i  i`* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Mar 25 iii i  i `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes10Marc Haber
27 Mar 25 iii i  i  `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Mar 25 iii i  i   `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes8Marc Haber
27 Mar 25 iii i  i    `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Mar 25 iii i  i     +* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes5marrgol
28 Mar 25 iii i  i     i+* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes3Chris Ahlstrom
28 Mar 25 iii i  i     ii`* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes2rbowman
29 Mar 25 iii i  i     ii `- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1Chris Ahlstrom
28 Mar 25 iii i  i     i`- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Apr04:54 iii i  i     `- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1Wayne
27 Mar 25 iii i  `- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1c186282
26 Mar 25 iii `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes3c186282
26 Mar 25 iii  `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes2rbowman
27 Mar 25 iii   `- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1c186282
25 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1Pancho
30 Mar 25 i`- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1Stéphane CARPENTIER
25 Mar 25 +- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1Ben Collver
30 Mar 25 `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes5Stéphane CARPENTIER
30 Mar 25  `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Mar 25   `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes3Stéphane CARPENTIER
31 Mar 25    `* Re: Useless Use Of Regexes2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Apr09:40     `- Re: Useless Use Of Regexes1Stéphane CARPENTIER

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal