Sujet : Re: Past Blast - "Wonder Woman 1984" - Corp Guy Using PET
De : spamtrap42 (at) *nospam* jacob21819.net (Robert Riches)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 06. Apr 2025, 01:14:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : none-at-all
Message-ID : <slrnvv3hr3.g7g.spamtrap42@one.localnet>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-04-05, c186282 <
c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
...
>
I still see debate over whether the 6502 was 'better'
than the 6809. The 6502 was envisioned as the 'improved'
6809 by the Motorola defectors - and in some ways was.
However they also left out some registers that were
convenient to compiler writers. So, no verdict.
I don't have chapter and verse to quote, but back in the day I
was told that the original design of the 6502 _WAS_ superior to
the 6809, but Motorola sued on a basis of IP theft or similar,
and the 6502 was dumbed down by removing registers and/or
crippling the indexing modes. One of the first things that
struck me about the 6502's indexing and other addressing modes
was that it looked/smelled crippled.
Around 1980 or so, I had a short assembly program for 6502. It
may have been a college assignment. Just for fun, I rewrote it
for 6800 and then for 6809. Then, I counted the number of
instructions in all three versions. The 6800 version used 2/3
the number of instructions as the 6502 version. The 6809 version
used half of the instructions of the 6502 version.
-- Robert Richesspamtrap42@jacob21819.net(Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)