Sujet : Re: Favorite Font
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscDate : 18. Apr 2025, 17:50:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrn100508d.2j5qk.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
John Ames <
commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote at 19:34 this Thursday (GMT):
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 19:00:03 -0000 (UTC)
candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
>
True enough - never liked those, either. I'd actually put the FOSS
Alternatives (TM) over both, in a head-to-head; it just doesn't make
Liberation *aesthetically pleasing,* is all.
Again, theyre Just Fine.
>
They're perfectly functional; I just don't find them particularly
pleasant/beautiful, which was the initial point of discussion.
Fair enough, sorry.
Wow, you wrote a novel? Can we see?
>
It's under another 'nym on another corner of the 'Net that I try to
keep separate-ish, but if you drop me a line on my personal e-mail I
might not mind sharing ;)
maybe
-- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
Favorite Font
Re: Favorite Font -- Unicode Test