Sujet : Re: Anybody Using IPv6?
De : mh+usenetspam1118 (at) *nospam* zugschl.us (Marc Haber)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 21. May 2025, 15:52:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details
Message-ID : <100kpc3$6vge$1@news1.tnib.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
"Carlos E. R." <
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-05-21 13:16, Marc Haber wrote:
I think that the local resolver should² also refrain from asking for
AAAA records if the local system doesn't have IPv6, but I don't know
whether this special-case handling is implemented at all. And I'm too
lazy to look that up.
But all this needs to be taken into account before someone can comment
about speed of one IP protocol compared to the other on a level that
is beyond passing myths.
>
It just is a perceived fact. On some machines, if an application gets
back from the system a list of addresses to try, and tries IPv6 first
when there is no actual IPv6 internet connectivity, there is a small
delay waiting for the request to fail, and then try the next address in
the list.
pcap/strace or it didn't happen.
Please note that _broken_ IPv6, for example when the router announces
an IPv6 but the network doesn't return a host unreachable ICMPv6
message from the place where connectivity is missing, will cause an
IPv6-enabled application to wait for the time out. But that is an
error in the _network_ setup, and should not happen in the case where
the end system (the one with the application running) has v6 enabled
on a non-v6-enabled network.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im HeaderRhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402