Sujet : Re: Anybody Using IPv6?
De : mh+usenetspam1118 (at) *nospam* zugschl.us (Marc Haber)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 21. May 2025, 20:21:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details
Message-ID : <100l93s$819p$1@news1.tnib.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
"Carlos E. R." <
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-05-21 08:05, Marc Haber wrote:
"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-05-20 23:14, Marc Haber wrote:
"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-05-20 19:43, Marc Haber wrote:
What does the IPv6 routing table of the system in question say?
>
I don't have a problem with the laptop currently. The problem was some
years ago, on several computers.
>
cer@Isengard:~> ip route
default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0
192.168.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.16
cer@Isengard:~>
>
That is not the IPv6 routing table.
>
That is all there is.
The correct command is ip -6 route.
You don't have the most basic knowledge and still you feel yourself
qualified to judge about the protocol. That's Dunning-Kruger at work.
>
I don't have IPv6, I don't have to remember IPv6 related commands.
>
cer@Laicolasse:~> ip -6 route
fe80::/64 dev wlan0 proto kernel metric 1024 pref medium
cer@Laicolasse:~>
So there is, as expected, only a route for the link local network,
making any connection attempt to a non-local IPv6 address error out
immediately, and a well-behaved application will immediately retry the
next address for the target host. That costs time, but like half a
millisecond or so. You will only notice that in high performance
networking. Your shell prompt wastes more CPU cycles every time it
gets displayed.
On a slow machine, about a millisecond, yes. That matters in high
performance computing, where professionals do the administration. It
does absolutely not matter on a personal workstation that spends 99 %
of its CPU cycles waiting for keystrokes anyway.
>
It is the network speed that matters, which is much slower.
There is zero evidence about IPv6 network speed being slower than IPv4
on a feature-par network.
>
That is not what happened, and not what I said.
What did you say?
Greetings
Marc
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im HeaderRhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402