Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col misc |
On 2025-05-21 08:05, Marc Haber wrote:"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:>On 2025-05-20 23:14, Marc Haber wrote:"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:>On 2025-05-20 19:43, Marc Haber wrote:>What does the IPv6 routing table of the system in question say?>
I don't have a problem with the laptop currently. The problem was some
years ago, on several computers.
>
cer@Isengard:~> ip route
default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0
192.168.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.16
cer@Isengard:~>
That is not the IPv6 routing table.
That is all there is.
The correct command is ip -6 route.
You don't have the most basic knowledge and still you feel yourself
qualified to judge about the protocol. That's Dunning-Kruger at work.
I don't have IPv6, I don't have to remember IPv6 related commands.
>
cer@Laicolasse:~> ip -6 route
fe80::/64 dev wlan0 proto kernel metric 1024 pref medium
cer@Laicolasse:~>
>On a slow machine, about a millisecond, yes. That matters in high>
performance computing, where professionals do the administration. It
does absolutely not matter on a personal workstation that spends 99 %
of its CPU cycles waiting for keystrokes anyway.
It is the network speed that matters, which is much slower.
There is zero evidence about IPv6 network speed being slower than IPv4
on a feature-par network.
That is not what happened, and not what I said.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.