Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 27. May 2025, 01:39:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10131kd$28rgm$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Mon, 26 May 2025 11:11:37 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote:
You see, they just assumed that Linux was free of politics, and
opinionated vendors, but that isn't necessarily the case.
There is no getting away from “politics”. As someone once said, “the
personal is the political”. When you choose to give money to a proprietary
company, you are giving them more power -- not just economic power, but
also political power. Do they exercise that power wisely, for the good of
their customers and the rest of the world? Or do they use it to maximize
their own short-term profits, and to hell with the long-term consequences?
You know the answer to that as well as I do.
When a business chooses to use software that is made available under Free
Software licences, they may not think they are doing it for any
“political” (by which they mean “ideological”) reasons: they may say they
do it just because it gives them more control to chart their own course
and remain competitive in today’s unpredictable market. But such decisions
have “political” consequences anyway.