Sujet : Re: Distros specifically designed for children
De : c186282 (at) *nospam* nnada.net (c186282)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.miscDate : 29. May 2025, 04:23:12
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <Iz2dnZbjA5igTqr1nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
On 5/28/25 3:26 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
CURRENTLY - I think the Linux universe has become just
TOO diverse. More standardization would be a longer
term advantage.
systemd tried that and divided the worlds even more.
Systemd wasn't the "best" unity tactic, IMHO.
I know some HATE it ... but I'm more agnostic.
It does have its uses, does simplify a lot of
things. Sometimes I use its features, sometimes
I don't.
In any case, systemd does NOT seem to be of such
evil intent as the Winders registry.
As for 'un-necessary' distros, normally they do not
get broad traction and soon disappear. The current
quad of more-or-less Deb/RH/Arch/Slack IS big enough
for almost everybody AND allows developers to better
concentrate their efforts. TOO much diversity is as
bad/wasteful as too little.