Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS

Liste des GroupesRevenir à com programmer 
Sujet : Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS
De : admin (at) *nospam* 127.0.0.1 (Kerr-Mudd, John)
Groupes : alt.lang.asm comp.os.msdos.programmer
Date : 28. Aug 2024, 08:53:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Dis
Message-ID : <20240828085342.16f1c94c5aa1b26c2066f428@127.0.0.1>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:17:20 +0700
JJ <jj4public@outlook.com> wrote:

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:12:15 +0100, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
Last chance: could it be that in your environment ds<>es? - here's the same
code with a push pop at the start & a few more exits if run out of text..
 
No. It wouldn't be a DOS compatible system if DS!=ES at COM program startup.
So, same result in Windows XP. And I did tested it.
 
1E07B43F B5FDBAC3 01CD2191 E3F989D7 89D65781 3D2D6474 06B03EF2 AEE354B0
0AF2AEE3 26B020F2 AEE3208A 05473C30 7226244F D43788C2 8A054724 4FD43788
D4D51088 04464974 0FE2E05A 89F129D1 43B440CD 214BEBAA 3C2075ED 380574BF
EBE74E6F 74206120 64626720 66696C65 0D0A245A BA6201B4 09CD21C3
 
This one works

Phew!


but still require the `->` custom marker, which I don't want,
because it won't work for standard DEBUG dump from anyone.


Oh dear. I felt sure I'd catered for that.
So I just tested, yup, it's OK here.



--
Bah, and indeed Humbug.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Aug 24 * Base85 for DOS35Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Aug 24 `* Re: Base85 for DOS34Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Aug 24  `* Re: Base85 for DOS33Kerr-Mudd, John
22 Aug 24   `* Re: Base85 for DOS32Kerr-Mudd, John
22 Aug 24    `* Re: Base85 for DOS31Kerr-Mudd, John
22 Aug 24     `* Re: Base85 for DOS30Kerr-Mudd, John
23 Aug 24      `* Re: Base85 for DOS29JJ
23 Aug 24       +- Re: Base85 for DOS1Kerr-Mudd, John
23 Aug 24       +* Re: Base85 for DOS16Kerr-Mudd, John
23 Aug 24       i`* Re: Base85 for DOS15JJ
24 Aug 24       i `* undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS14Kerr-Mudd, John
24 Aug 24       i  `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS13JJ
24 Aug 24       i   `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS12Kerr-Mudd, John
25 Aug 24       i    `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS11Kerr-Mudd, John
25 Aug 24       i     `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS10JJ
25 Aug 24       i      `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS9Kerr-Mudd, John
25 Aug 24       i       `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS8Kerr-Mudd, John
25 Aug 24       i        `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS7JJ
26 Aug 24       i         `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS6Kerr-Mudd, John
27 Aug 24       i          `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS5Kerr-Mudd, John
28 Aug 24       i           `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS4JJ
28 Aug 24       i            `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS3Kerr-Mudd, John
28 Aug 24       i             `* Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS2Kerr-Mudd, John
2 Sep 24       i              `- Re: undump tool (was: Re: Base85 for DOS1Kerr-Mudd, John
23 Aug 24       `* Re: Base85 for DOS11wolfgang kern
23 Aug 24        `* Re: Base85 for DOS10Kerr-Mudd, John
23 Aug 24         +* Re: Base85 for DOS3wolfgang kern
24 Aug 24         i`* Re: Base85 for DOS2Kerr-Mudd, John
7 Sep 24         i `- Re: Base85 for DOS1Kerr-Mudd, John
24 Aug 24         `* Re: Base85 for DOS6Kerr-Mudd, John
24 Aug 24          `* Re: Base85 for DOS5wolfgang kern
24 Aug 24           +* Re: Base85 for DOS2Kerr-Mudd, John
24 Aug 24           i`- Re: Base85 for DOS1wolfgang kern
24 Aug 24           `* Re: Base85 for DOS2Kerr-Mudd, John
24 Aug 24            `- Re: Base85 for DOS1wolfgang kern

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal