Re: VMS x86-64 database server

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: VMS x86-64 database server
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 09. Jul 2025, 00:40:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <104kaa4$3qkfr$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 18:14:32 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

On 7/8/2025 5:58 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 07:14:44 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>
$ link main2 + sys$input/opt main1shr/share $
>
what bucket would you put main1.exe in?
 
Note that, on *nix systems, shareable libraries can be specified
directly on the command line, without having to go through options
files. Why does the VMS linker need options files for this common case?
 
/SHARE in command line means producing a shareable image.
 
/SHARE in option file means linking with a shareable image.
 
Different meaning based on context.

Given that the VMS DCL syntax was specifically designed to allow a
distinction between per-file qualifiers and global qualifiers, this seems
like a strange limitation, don’t you think?

Again, *nix linkers are able to manage both on the command line, without
needing separate options files.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Jul20:45 * VMS x86-64 database server61Arne Vajhøj
6 Jul22:39 +- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul23:07 +* Re: VMS x86-64 database server34Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul00:19 i`* Re: VMS x86-64 database server33Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jul00:58 i `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server32Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul03:42 i  `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server31Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jul19:07 i   `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server30Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul19:16 i    +* Re: VMS x86-64 database server2Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul19:21 i    i`- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul23:07 i    `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jul00:28 i     +* Re: VMS x86-64 database server14Arne Vajhøj
8 Jul01:26 i     i`* Re: VMS x86-64 database server13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jul13:45 i     i `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server12Arne Vajhøj
8 Jul22:57 i     i  `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jul23:40 i     i   `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server10Arne Vajhøj
9 Jul00:38 i     i    `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Jul02:54 i     i     `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server8Arne Vajhøj
9 Jul08:25 i     i      `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Jul20:33 i     i       `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server6Arne Vajhøj
10 Jul00:07 i     i        `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jul00:51 i     i         `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server4Arne Vajhøj
10 Jul02:21 i     i          `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jul03:24 i     i           `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server2Arne Vajhøj
10 Jul05:28 i     i            `- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jul14:35 i     `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server12Arne Vajhøj
8 Jul22:56 i      `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server11Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jul23:20 i       `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server10Arne Vajhøj
9 Jul00:37 i        `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Jul01:31 i         `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server8Arne Vajhøj
9 Jul08:22 i          `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jul01:04 i           `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server6Arne Vajhøj
10 Jul01:25 i            +* Re: VMS x86-64 database server4Arne Vajhøj
10 Jul02:35 i            i`* Re: VMS x86-64 database server3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jul03:26 i            i `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server2Arne Vajhøj
10 Jul06:48 i            i  `- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jul02:33 i            `- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Jul23:11 +- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Arne Vajhøj
6 Jul23:39 `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server24Craig A. Berry
7 Jul00:57  `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server23Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul15:50   `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server22Mark Berryman
7 Jul19:01    `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server21Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul22:06     `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server20Mark Berryman
7 Jul22:36      +* Re: VMS x86-64 database server2Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul22:37      i`- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Arne Vajhøj
7 Jul23:08      `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jul00:21       `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server16Arne Vajhøj
8 Jul01:27        `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jul12:14         `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server14Arne Vajhøj
8 Jul22:58          `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jul23:14           +* Re: VMS x86-64 database server10Arne Vajhøj
9 Jul00:40           i`* Re: VMS x86-64 database server9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Jul03:18           i `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server8Arne Vajhøj
9 Jul08:27           i  +- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Jul11:16           i  `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server6hb0815
9 Jul15:13           i   `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server5Arne Vajhøj
9 Jul17:51           i    `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server4hb0815
9 Jul18:39           i     `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server3Arne Vajhøj
9 Jul18:56           i      +- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Chris Townley
9 Jul20:55           i      `- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1hb0815
10 Jul01:12           `* Re: VMS x86-64 database server2bill
10 Jul13:00            `- Re: VMS x86-64 database server1Dan Cross

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal