Re: Apache + mod_php performance

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Apache + mod_php performance
De : arne (at) *nospam* vajhoej.dk (Arne Vajhøj)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 02. Oct 2024, 16:32:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
Message-ID : <66fd67ab$0$715$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Summary numbers and analysis.
                         no db con pool     db con pool
Apache + CGI               4 req/sec           N/A
Apache + mod_php (cfg A)  11 req/sec         11 req/sec
Apache + mod_php (cfg B)  22 req/sec         22 req/sec
Apache + mod_php (cfg C)  94 req/sec        103 req/sec
Apache + mod_php (cfg D)  85 req/sec         83 req/sec
Tomcat + Quercus         208 req/sec        214 req/sec
Apache + mod_php (win) ~1200 req/sec      ~6000 req/sec
Note that Windows got more CPU and RAM than VMS, so not really
comparable. With resources similar to VMS then I would expect
maybe 1/10'th of througput.
I have not tested Apache on Linux, but I would expect the numbers
to be even higher than Windows - it is what is used by most of the web.
config       KeepAlive   KeepALiveTimeout     MaxSpareServers    MaxClients
   A             On             15                   10               150
   B             On             15                   50               300
   C             Off            N/A                  50               300
   D             On             1                   300               300
A is default config
B is as many resources that my VMS system could support
C is keep alive disabled
D is keep alive limited
Allocating as many resources as one can spare make sense. But it can
be a lot of resources. Expect memory usage to be MaxClients * 25 MB.
But for the rest then as usual there are tradeoffs.
config    browser benefit    browser benefit    througput
           keep alive         keep alive
           within page        across pages
    B          yes                yes               low
    C          no                 no                acceptable
    D          yes                no                almost acceptable
I consider 100 req/sec as acceptable. Good would be 200-300 which
is what Quercus can do and the exterpolation from:
     (througput PHP Apache / throughput static Apache) * throughput static OSU
I suspect that most will find D attractive.
Arne

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Sep 24 * Apache + mod_php performance274Arne Vajhøj
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance267Dan Cross
25 Sep 24 i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance266Arne Vajhøj
25 Sep 24 i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance265Dan Cross
25 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance264Arne Vajhøj
25 Sep 24 i   +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance262Dan Cross
25 Sep 24 i   i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance261Arne Vajhøj
25 Sep 24 i   i +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance12Arne Vajhøj
25 Sep 24 i   i i+- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 i   i i+* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 i   i ii`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj
26 Sep 24 i   i ii `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 i   i i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance7Craig A. Berry
26 Sep 24 i   i i +- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
26 Sep 24 i   i i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Sep 24 i   i i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance4Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i   `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Sep 24 i   i i    `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Craig A. Berry
27 Sep 24 i   i i     `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 i   i +- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
26 Sep 24 i   i +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance21Arne Vajhøj
26 Sep 24 i   i i+* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 i   i ii`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj
26 Sep 24 i   i ii `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Sep 24 i   i i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance17Craig A. Berry
26 Sep 24 i   i i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance16Craig A. Berry
26 Sep 24 i   i i  +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Chris Townley
26 Sep 24 i   i i  i`- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance13Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i   `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Sep 24 i   i i    `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance11Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i     +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Sep 24 i   i i     i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i     i `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Sep 24 i   i i     +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Simon Clubley
27 Sep 24 i   i i     i`- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i     `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance5Craig A. Berry
27 Sep 24 i   i i      `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance4Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i       `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Dan Cross
27 Sep 24 i   i i        `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i         `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Dan Cross
26 Sep 24 i   i +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance38Dan Cross
27 Sep 24 i   i i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance37Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Chris Townley
27 Sep 24 i   i i i`- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance9Dan Cross
27 Sep 24 i   i i i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance8Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance7Dan Cross
27 Sep 24 i   i i i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance6Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i i   `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance5Dan Cross
27 Sep 24 i   i i i    `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance4Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i i     `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Dan Cross
27 Sep 24 i   i i i      `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   i i i       `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Dan Cross
28 Sep 24 i   i i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance25Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance24Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i   `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance23Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i    `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance22Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i     +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i     i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance6Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i     i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i     i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance4Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i     i   `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i     i    `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i     i     `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i     `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance14Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i      `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i       `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance12Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i        +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i        i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i        i `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i        `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i i         `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance7Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i i          +- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Chris Townley
28 Sep 24 i   i i          `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Sep 24 i   i i           +- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
29 Sep 24 i   i i           `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Craig A. Berry
29 Sep 24 i   i i            +- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
30 Sep 24 i   i i            `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance188Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i  +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance56Dan Cross
28 Sep 24 i   i  i+* Re: Apache + mod_php performance51Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i  ii+- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Sep 24 i   i  ii+* Re: Apache + mod_php performance48Dave Froble
1 Oct 24 i   i  iii`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance47Dan Cross
1 Oct 24 i   i  iii `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance46Arne Vajhøj
1 Oct 24 i   i  iii  +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance6Arne Vajhøj
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance4Arne Vajhøj
3 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i   `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i    `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj
3 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i     `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii  +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance5Dan Cross
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance4Arne Vajhøj
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance3Dan Cross
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii  i   `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Dan Cross
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance33Dave Froble
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii   +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance31Arne Vajhøj
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii   i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance30Dan Cross
2 Oct 24 i   i  iii   `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Dan Cross
30 Sep 24 i   i  ii`- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Dan Cross
29 Sep 24 i   i  i`* Re: Apache + mod_php performance4Arne Vajhøj
28 Sep 24 i   i  `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance131Arne Vajhøj
27 Sep 24 i   `- Re: Apache + mod_php performance1Arne Vajhøj
24 Sep 24 +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Sep 24 +* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Simon Clubley
2 Oct 24 `* Re: Apache + mod_php performance2Arne Vajhøj

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal