Re: Bare Metal VMS (Frame.Work Laptops) <<<< complete answer late

In article <vhti7a$1sg3t$1@dont-email.me>, vlf@star.enet.dec.com
(Subcommandante XDelta) wrote:

Perhaps the VMSGenerations group could amongst its members,
identify two rock solid, industry standard, server blades,
one Intel, and one AMD, though in the former case, not using
the latest generation of CPUs - from what I gather they are
a bit dodgy.

Blades are not as big a thing as they used to be, and supporting just two
blades locks bare-metal VMS into that blade manufacturer's offerings.
When you have a niche OS, you don't want to give customers' finance
people an extra reason to dislike it.

As for Hypervisor/VMS, perhaps, this is an interesting option, to
make it a little more palatable to the VMS ecosystem:
 
https://blackberry.qnx.com/en/ultimate-guides/embedded-hypervisor

Demanding a hypervisor that isn't well-established in business IT is
another thing for customers' management to dislike.

The VSI plan is to run on the well-established hypervisors, and confine
the unfamiliar aspects of VMS to individual virtual machines. Sadly,
Broadcom's greed after taking over VMware is making that harder.

John