Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?
De : usenet (at) *nospam* cropcircledogs.com (Richard Jordan)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 07. Aug 2024, 17:21:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v906ue$36gjg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/7/24 6:59 AM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
On 8/6/24 2:49 PM, Richard Jordan wrote:
I have contacted VSI but thought I'd ask here too.  If anyone can give this a try and let me know if they experience the problem I'd appreciate knowing.
>
Integrity server, VMS V8.4-2L1, TCPIP V5.7 eco 5 with any later hotfixes as of June 2023 applied.
>
V8.4-2L3 is coming but I can't install it to check for a while.
>
We use the 'sendmail.com' freeware to send email with binary attachments (mostly PDFs) with customized SMTP headers.  On this VSI system we get a single error every time we run SFF from the command procedure.
>
Exact same procedure on a V8.3 Alpha and an HP V8.4 Integrity run without error so we're tentatively calling it a VSI issue.
>
Every run using symbol form via
>
      sff :== $SYS$SYSTEM:TCPIP$SMTP_SFF.EXE
>
(as defined within sendmail.com)
>
generates the following error, but also still creates the email successfully:
>
      %LIB-F-INVNBDS, invalid numeric byte data string
>
Happens with any normal or priv'd account, regardless of the body text file, presence or absence of attachments, who the recipient is, presence or absence of a subject line.
>
I don't have any other systems to test on (specifically no other VSI systems).
>
Thanks for any info.
 Do you get anything interesting from:
 $ MCR TCPIP$SYSTEM:TCPIP$SMTP_SFF.EXE sys$input: -log sys$error: -loglevel 1
...
^Z
 ?
Yes and no.  Thanks for reminding that many of these utilities have those options!  I had forgotten; I rarely get to be in VMS anymore.
I ran it with one of the temp files sendmail.com created, and with the -log and -loglevel options, as well as with SYS$INPUT.
The one run with the sendmail temp file for input placed the %LIB-F-INVNBDS error as the first line in the error log, then a blank line, then SMTP configuration data, then the expected text from the input file appropriately escaped (munged).
The run with SYS$INPUT did the same.  If I just hit return, SFF exits with an error and the error log shows the %LIB-F-INVNBDS error at the top.  If I enter a valid SMTP command (MAIL FROM:) then ctrl-z errorlog shows the same; the LIB error, followed by a blank line, the contents of the SMTP config file, my one line and an end of input file notice.  And same if I hit ctrl-z immediately after running SFF, I get the LIB error, a blank line, then the SMTP config dump.
So the error is occurring 'early' and the cause is not logged.  Feels like a bug in the program.  Despite the fact that its listed as a 'fatal' error, the exit status from SFF on all of these tests was the same:
%0x00000001

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Aug 24 * SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?24Richard Jordan
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Aug 24 i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Arne Vajhøj
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Oswald Knoppers
7 Aug 24 i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Richard Jordan
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?4Craig A. Berry
7 Aug 24 i`* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?3Richard Jordan
7 Aug 24 i `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Craig A. Berry
7 Aug 24 i  `- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Richard Jordan
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Simon Clubley
7 Aug 24 i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Craig A. Berry
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Arne Vajhøj
7 Aug 24 i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Arne Vajhøj
13 Aug 24 `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?11Richard Jordan
14 Aug 24  `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?10Stephen Hoffman
14 Aug 24   `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?9Richard Jordan
14 Aug 24    +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Craig A. Berry
14 Aug 24    i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Arne Vajhøj
15 Aug 24    `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?6Stephen Hoffman
15 Aug 24     +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Aug 24     i`* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Scott Dorsey
19 Aug 24     i `- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Rich Alderson
15 Aug 24     +- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Richard Jordan
15 Aug 24     `- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Simon Clubley

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal