Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 21:17:06 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:Just that is is not lying when it says that it got it.On 10/20/2024 9:10 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:In other words, that the disk controller is not lying to you when it saysOn Sun, 20 Oct 2024 20:32:41 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:>On 10/20/2024 8:28 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>Transaction resilience is a standard thing with databases (and>
journalling filesystems) going back decades.
Yes.
>
But they can't do miracles.
They can ensure, to a high degree of confidence, that the on-disk
structure is consistent. That is to say, each transaction is either
recorded as completed or not recorded at all, nothing in-between.
Only if it can rely on a successful write not being lost.
a write has completed?
A system crash and restart will blank RAM and wipe out all OSNow you are really starting to sound like a believer in miracles ...>To be sure to come up ok after a system crash it is either write to>
plates or write to a cache that will survive the system crash (raid
controller cache with battery backup).
Unfortunately, that controller cache can’t guarantee any of these
things: it can’t do miracles either, all it does is add another point
of failure.
Yes - it can.
>
It is not impacted by a system crash.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.