Re: x86S Specification

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: x86S Specification
De : arne (at) *nospam* vajhoej.dk (Arne Vajhøj)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 03. Nov 2024, 15:22:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vg80uo$d0cf$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/3/2024 9:06 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven wrote:
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
x86-64 in long mode only support 2 modes in PTE's, so
VMS x86-64 is a hardware 2 mode OS 4 mode OS - U in ring 3,
S, E and K in ring 0.
 Not exactly.
 Ring 3 is used for Exec, Super, and User
 Ring 0 is used for kernel and for transitions between modes (SWIS)
 Running Exec and Super in ring 0 would blow away the separation (which, I might add, is there more for stability than for security, before I unintentionally re-start that debate)
You are more afraid that DCL or RMS would step on VMS than
applications would step on DCL or RMS?
Arne

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Oct 24 * x86S Specification13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Oct 24 `* Re: x86S Specification12Arne Vajhøj
18 Oct 24  `* Re: x86S Specification11Single Stage to Orbit
18 Oct 24   `* Re: x86S Specification10Arne Vajhøj
18 Oct 24    +* Re: x86S Specification2Single Stage to Orbit
21 Oct 24    i`- Re: x86S Specification1Simon Clubley
3 Nov 24    `* Re: x86S Specification7Camiel Vanderhoeven
3 Nov 24     `* Re: x86S Specification6Arne Vajhøj
3 Nov 24      `* Re: x86S Specification5Camiel Vanderhoeven
3 Nov 24       +* Re: x86S Specification2Arne Vajhøj
4 Nov 24       i`- Re: x86S Specification1Dan Cross
4 Nov 24       `* Re: x86S Specification2Arne Vajhøj
4 Nov 24        `- Re: x86S Specification1Dan Cross

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal