Sujet : Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 03. Dec 2024, 21:24:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vinpdj$avd9$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:40:40 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
If you look at what is available and what it is used for then you will
see that what is labeled type 1 is used for production and what is
labeled type 2 is used for development. It matters.
What people discovered was, they needed to run full-fat system management
suites, reporting tools, backup/maintenance tools etc on the hypervisor.
In other words, all the regular filesystem-management functions you need
on any server machine. So having it be a cut-down kernel (“type 1”) didn’t
cut it any more -- virtualization is nowadays done on full-function Linux
kernels (all “type 2”).
That’s why the distinction is obsolete.
VMWARE/ESXi Linux
Re: VMWARE/ESXi Linux
