Re: Fortran, no RAN ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Fortran, no RAN ?
De : brown_mi (at) *nospam* encompasserve.org (Michael Brown)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 17. Jun 2024, 05:09:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : House Harris Software
Message-ID : <v4ocuf$vft$2@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 17/6/24 03:54, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
On 6/16/2024 12:22 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
I've been building MTREK, written in fortran, on my community edition and it compiles fine but complains of no RAN function at link time.
 VMS Fortran got both RAN and the standard RANDOM_NUMBER:
 
That example was very reassuring when it compiled and ran, so I looked more carefully at my compiler warnings compiling MTREK...
           RNDOM = RAN(I1, I2)
..................^
%F90-W-WARNING, The number of arguments is incompatible with intrinsic procedure, assume 'external'.   [RAN]
at line number 67 in file SYS$SYSDEVICE:[MBROWN.DEVS.MTREK]mtrekini.for;4
and it is telling me the problem, assumed external because of too many parameters, then it tries to link some external name RAN which isn't there. I can understand this.
But the question now is why RAN(I1, I2) works on the VAX compiler,and not on the X86_64 compiler. And what is it doing with those 2 parameters on the VAX so I can simulate it somehow.
--
House Harris Software.
Making the world a safer place for our products.
https://eisner.decus.org/~brown_mi

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Jun 24 * Fortran, no RAN ?28Michael Brown
16 Jun 24 `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?27Arne Vajhøj
16 Jun 24  +* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?13Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  i`* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Jun 24  i `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?11Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  i  +* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?9Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  i  i+- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  i  i`* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 24  i  i `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?6John Reagan
18 Jun 24  i  i  +- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Stephen Hoffman
18 Jun 24  i  i  `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?4Arne Vajhøj
19 Jun 24  i  i   `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?3Simon Clubley
19 Jun 24  i  i    `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?2Chris Townley
19 Jun 24  i  i     `- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Simon Clubley
17 Jun 24  i  `- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?13Michael Brown
17 Jun 24   `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?12Arne Vajhøj
18 Jun 24    +* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?9Arne Vajhøj
19 Jun 24    i`* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?8Michael Brown
19 Jun 24    i `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?7Arne Vajhøj
20 Jun 24    i  `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?6Michael Brown
20 Jun 24    i   +* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?3abrsvc
20 Jun 24    i   i+- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj
21 Jun 24    i   i`- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Michael Brown
20 Jun 24    i   `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?2Arne Vajhøj
20 Jun 24    i    `- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj
18 Jun 24    `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?2Arne Vajhøj
19 Jun 24     `- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal