Re: Fortran, no RAN ?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Fortran, no RAN ?
De : arne (at) *nospam* vajhoej.dk (Arne Vajhøj)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 18. Jun 2024, 00:49:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
Message-ID : <6670cba7$0$719$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/17/2024 6:12 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
On 6/17/2024 12:09 AM, Michael Brown wrote:
But the question now is why RAN(I1, I2) works on the VAX compiler,and not on the X86_64 compiler. And what is it doing with those 2 parameters on the VAX so I can simulate it somehow.
 Are you sure that it is intrinsic and not something picked
up from some library?
 What type is RNDOM? Default REAL*4? Or Integer*4?
 If INTEGER*4 then my guess would be that:
 RAN(I1, I2)
 is:
 RAN_INT_IN_INTERVAL(LOW_BOUND, HIGH_BOUND)
But if RNDOM is REAL*4 then my guess would be:
RAN_LONGER_CYCLE(SEED1, SEED2)
Example:
       real*4 function ran2arg(seed1, seed2)
       implicit none
       integer*4 seed1, seed2
       integer*4 temp
       real*4 dummy
       temp = xor(seed1, seed2)
       ran2arg = ran(temp)
       seed1 = xor(ishc(seed1, 1), temp)
       seed2 = xor(ishc(seed2, -1), temp)
       end
Disclaimer: I do not know if the cycle from this one is actual longer.
Arne

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Jun 24 * Fortran, no RAN ?28Michael Brown
16 Jun 24 `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?27Arne Vajhøj
16 Jun 24  +* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?13Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  i`* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Jun 24  i `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?11Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  i  +* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?9Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  i  i+- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  i  i`* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 24  i  i `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?6John Reagan
18 Jun 24  i  i  +- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Stephen Hoffman
18 Jun 24  i  i  `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?4Arne Vajhøj
19 Jun 24  i  i   `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?3Simon Clubley
19 Jun 24  i  i    `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?2Chris Townley
19 Jun 24  i  i     `- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Simon Clubley
17 Jun 24  i  `- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj
17 Jun 24  `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?13Michael Brown
17 Jun 24   `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?12Arne Vajhøj
18 Jun 24    +* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?9Arne Vajhøj
19 Jun 24    i`* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?8Michael Brown
19 Jun 24    i `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?7Arne Vajhøj
20 Jun 24    i  `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?6Michael Brown
20 Jun 24    i   +* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?3abrsvc
20 Jun 24    i   i+- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj
21 Jun 24    i   i`- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Michael Brown
20 Jun 24    i   `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?2Arne Vajhøj
20 Jun 24    i    `- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj
18 Jun 24    `* Re: Fortran, no RAN ?2Arne Vajhøj
19 Jun 24     `- Re: Fortran, no RAN ?1Arne Vajhøj

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal