Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 28. Jul 2024, 14:42:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240728164217.00000da4@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On 28 Jul 2024 13:23:16 -0000
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

Michael S  <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 02:50:26 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
 
=20
(And of course Dave Cutler took .EXE along with other VMS-isms with
him to Windows NT, but that=E2=80=99s another story.)
=20 
>
And of course you made it up.
Microsoft introduced .exe extension for relocatable executives back
in 1982 (MS-DOS 1.25). 6+ years before they hired Cutler and 11 years
before shipment of the first Cutler's Microsoft OS. 
 
That was Seattle Business Computing whose product was bought out by
Microsoft and became MS-DOS.  SBC basically made a quick and dirty
copy of Gary Kildall's CP/M on the cheap without really understanding
all the features they were copying.  But one of the things they copied
well were the file extensions including .EXE for executables.
>

According to my understanding of Wikipedia article, the OS that
Microsoft bought from Seattle Computer Products and that they
published as PC-DOS had no support for relocatable executives. The only
supported format for programs was non-relocatable .com format.
Support for .exe format was added approximately a year later by
Microsoft's programmers, most likely by Mark Zbikowski, who was a young
guy the never worked for Digital Research or for Seattle Computer
Products.

CP/M itself was modelled after RT-11 which is where Kildall got the
idea for the .EXE extension.
--scott
>
>
 
 
 



Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Jul 24 * Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Jul 24 `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...12Michael S
28 Jul 24  +* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...8Scott Dorsey
28 Jul 24  i`* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...7Michael S
28 Jul 24  i +* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...5Scott Dorsey
28 Jul 24  i i+- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Single Stage to Orbit
28 Jul 24  i i`* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...3Rich Alderson
28 Jul 24  i i `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Jul 24  i i  `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Rich Alderson
28 Jul 24  i `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Bob Eager
29 Jul 24  `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...3Simon Clubley
30 Jul 24   `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...2Arne Vajhøj
30 Jul 24    `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal