Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...
De : news0009 (at) *nospam* eager.cx (Bob Eager)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 28. Jul 2024, 17:56:37
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lgnbi5F3pe6U2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 16:42:17 +0300, Michael S wrote:

On 28 Jul 2024 13:23:16 -0000 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
 
Michael S  <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 02:50:26 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
 
=20
(And of course Dave Cutler took .EXE along with other VMS-isms with
him to Windows NT, but that=E2=80=99s another story.)
=20
>
And of course you made it up.
Microsoft introduced .exe extension for relocatable executives back in
1982 (MS-DOS 1.25). 6+ years before they hired Cutler and 11 years
before shipment of the first Cutler's Microsoft OS.
 
That was Seattle Business Computing whose product was bought out by
Microsoft and became MS-DOS.  SBC basically made a quick and dirty copy
of Gary Kildall's CP/M on the cheap without really understanding all
the features they were copying.  But one of the things they copied well
were the file extensions including .EXE for executables.
>
>
According to my understanding of Wikipedia article, the OS that
Microsoft bought from Seattle Computer Products and that they published
as PC-DOS had no support for relocatable executives. The only supported
format for programs was non-relocatable .com format.
Support for .exe format was added approximately a year later by
Microsoft's programmers, most likely by Mark Zbikowski, who was a young
guy the never worked for Digital Research or for Seattle Computer
Products.

And the signature at the start of Microsoft .EXE files survives, still
with MZ - Marks' initials.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Jul 24 * Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Jul 24 `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...12Michael S
28 Jul 24  +* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...8Scott Dorsey
28 Jul 24  i`* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...7Michael S
28 Jul 24  i +* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...5Scott Dorsey
28 Jul 24  i i+- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Single Stage to Orbit
28 Jul 24  i i`* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...3Rich Alderson
28 Jul 24  i i `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Jul 24  i i  `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Rich Alderson
28 Jul 24  i `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Bob Eager
29 Jul 24  `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...3Simon Clubley
30 Jul 24   `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...2Arne Vajhøj
30 Jul 24    `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal