Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...
De : news (at) *nospam* alderson.users.panix.com (Rich Alderson)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 28. Jul 2024, 20:14:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <mddr0bd49di.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Gnus v5.7/Emacs 22.3
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) writes:

Michael S  <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:

According to my understanding of Wikipedia article, the OS that
Microsoft bought from Seattle Computer Products and that they
published as PC-DOS had no support for relocatable executives. The only
supported format for programs was non-relocatable .com format.
Support for .exe format was added approximately a year later by
Microsoft's programmers, most likely by Mark Zbikowski, who was a young
guy the never worked for Digital Research or for Seattle Computer
Products.

Interesting!

And now that I think about it, CP/M used the .CMD extension for
relocatable executables, which was added on there long after the
.COM extension for absolute executables was used.

So .EXE may have been a Microsoft invention.
--scott

CP/M itself was modelled after RT-11 which is where Kildall got the
idea for the .EXE extension.
--scott

TOPS-20 (based on TENEX) used the .EXE extension on sharable executables,
although TENEX used .SAV on both sharable and nonsharable executables.  Tops-10
used .SAV (or .LOW and .HGH for executables with a sharable segment), until
late in the game when TOPS-20 style sharable executables came to Tops-10.

I believe that RT-11 got .EXE from the larger systems.

--
Rich Alderson   news@alderson.users.panix.com
      Audendum est, et veritas investiganda; quam etiamsi non assequamur,
  omnino tamen proprius, quam nunc sumus, ad eam perveniemus.
--Galen

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Jul 24 * Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Jul 24 `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...12Michael S
28 Jul 24  +* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...8Scott Dorsey
28 Jul 24  i`* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...7Michael S
28 Jul 24  i +* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...5Scott Dorsey
28 Jul 24  i i+- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Single Stage to Orbit
28 Jul 24  i i`* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...3Rich Alderson
28 Jul 24  i i `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Jul 24  i i  `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Rich Alderson
28 Jul 24  i `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Bob Eager
29 Jul 24  `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...3Simon Clubley
30 Jul 24   `* Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...2Arne Vajhøj
30 Jul 24    `- Re: Never Got Used To Those New-Fangled VMS Filename Extensions ...1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal