Sujet : Re: BridgeWorks
De : davef (at) *nospam* tsoft-inc.com (Dave Froble)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 08. Aug 2024, 00:25:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v90vnt$3ei56$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 7/24/2024 10:59 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
On 7/24/2024 7:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:56:11 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>
In some cases an encrypted tunnel can be used to mitigate the problem
of unencrypted or weakly encrypted traffic.
>
But it is not always possible. Like in B2C scenarios.
>
SSL/TLS does the job in that situation.
>
Read the thread.
>
We are talking about the case where something are stuck at
an old unsafe version of SSL/TLS, so no - SSL/TLS does not do the job
in that situation.
>
Arne
>
No, we were discussing apps implemented in an older and currently unsupported programming language. It's possible that such apps could call the latest SSL/TLS.
-- David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.comDFE Ultralights, Inc.170 Grimplin RoadVanderbilt, PA 15486
BridgeWorks
Re: BridgeWorks