Re: Packages

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Packages
De : kludge (at) *nospam* panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 12. Aug 2024, 12:03:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID : <v9cq5t$k46$1@panix2.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
Lawrence D'Oliveiro  <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 16:55:58 -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote:
>
In theory, if one knew the locations of *all* of the pieces, one could
reverse engineer an older kit and build a new one like it with the new
images and data from an installation.  But there are a lot of things
that could go wrong, depending on what changed between versions.
>
Seems like proprietary vendors do *not* have the incentive to support any
kind of modular package management.

It's in their advantage to support package management for third-party
applications, because it makes it easier for third-party applications to
release and support their products.

It is against their advantage to support package management for the operating
system itself, because it will mean people will strip it down and no two
installations will be the same (as often happens with Linux) and this makes
support much more difficult.  They sell all of these parts and they want you
to use them all together and never separate them.  Not even to disable Clippy.
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Aug 24 * Packages11Single Stage to Orbit
9 Aug 24 `* Re: Packages10Arne Vajhøj
9 Aug 24  +* Re: Packages6Single Stage to Orbit
9 Aug 24  i`* Re: Packages5John Reagan
9 Aug 24  i `* Re: Packages4Single Stage to Orbit
9 Aug 24  i  `* Re: Packages3Chris Townley
9 Aug 24  i   `* Re: Packages2Single Stage to Orbit
10 Aug 24  i    `- Re: Packages1Dave Froble
9 Aug 24  `* Re: Packages3Craig A. Berry
10 Aug 24   `* Re: Packages2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Aug 24    `- Re: Packages1Scott Dorsey

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal