Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?
De : clubley (at) *nospam* remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP (Simon Clubley)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 15. Aug 2024, 13:08:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9kr4l$uqhh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet)
On 2024-08-14, Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> wrote:
>
Or tested, seemingly. Defaulting to an open relay is just spectacularly
stupid. Default an unconfigured mail server startup to a safe
configuration (e.g. local only), and generate appropriate log chatter.
>

At least adding support for actually turning off the open relay was an
improvement over what came previously.

I've cobbled together mail relaying for some installation requirements,
but it's likely safer to disable the SMTP giblets within the grafted-on
IP stack entirely, and modify the apps to access a remote mail server
using either direct or indirect ESMTP access.
>

I was one of the people 20+ years ago trying to get HP to actually give
us an option to turn off the open relay. I think I've talked about this
before, but I got a support person who simply didn't understand the issue
and I had to spend time teaching him about the issue and the implications.

Simon.

--
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Walking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Aug 24 * SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?24Richard Jordan
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Aug 24 i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Arne Vajhøj
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Oswald Knoppers
7 Aug 24 i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Richard Jordan
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?4Craig A. Berry
7 Aug 24 i`* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?3Richard Jordan
7 Aug 24 i `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Craig A. Berry
7 Aug 24 i  `- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Richard Jordan
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Simon Clubley
7 Aug 24 i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Craig A. Berry
7 Aug 24 +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Arne Vajhøj
7 Aug 24 i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Arne Vajhøj
13 Aug 24 `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?11Richard Jordan
14 Aug 24  `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?10Stephen Hoffman
14 Aug 24   `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?9Richard Jordan
14 Aug 24    +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Craig A. Berry
14 Aug 24    i`- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Arne Vajhøj
15 Aug 24    `* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?6Stephen Hoffman
15 Aug 24     +* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Aug 24     i`* Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?2Scott Dorsey
19 Aug 24     i `- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Rich Alderson
15 Aug 24     +- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Richard Jordan
15 Aug 24     `- Re: SFF problem with VSI on Integrity?1Simon Clubley

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal