Sujet : Re: New VSI post on Youtube
De : arne (at) *nospam* vajhoej.dk (Arne Vajhøj)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 19. Aug 2024, 02:17:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9u6ed$2irmk$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/18/2024 8:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:30:59 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
25-40 years ago there were workstations running VMS, SunOS, Solaris,
HP-UX, AIX, Ultrix, Tru64 etc..
>
Today a workstations is just a marketing term for a high-end PC running
Windows or Linux.
Linux is the one that still offers the full “workstation” capabilities.
Microsoft called their desktop version of NT “Workstation”, but all its
server-like capabilities were carefully crippled to avoid cannibalizing
sales of its actual servers.
Most (commercial) Linux distros comes with a "server" version and a
"desktop" version.
Redhat has a "workstation" version, but it is really a desktop version.
I don't think there is much difference in how Linux vendors and
Microsoft position server and desktop products.
There probably is a difference in how server applications
act. Some Windows server application will actually require a
Windows server edition. I don't think many Linux server
applications will actually check if it is running on
a server edition or desktop edition of RHEL/SUSE/Ubuntu/whatever.
For many reasons (it would be very non-Linux'ish, it would
be lot of work to maintain a list of all Linux distro editions,
a lot of it is open source so it would be easy to remove a check
and rebuild).
Arne