Sujet : Re: New VSI post on Youtube
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 19. Aug 2024, 02:50:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9u8cv$2n4th$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; )
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:17:00 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
On 8/18/2024 8:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:30:59 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>
25-40 years ago there were workstations running VMS, SunOS, Solaris,
HP-UX, AIX, Ultrix, Tru64 etc..
>
Today a workstations is just a marketing term for a high-end PC
running Windows or Linux.
Linux is the one that still offers the full “workstation” capabilities.
Microsoft called their desktop version of NT “Workstation”, but all its
server-like capabilities were carefully crippled to avoid cannibalizing
sales of its actual servers.
Most (commercial) Linux distros comes with a "server" version and a
"desktop" version.
Same software, just choose different packages to install. And you can
change your mind later and just install/remove different packages, without
a reinstall. (Unlike Windows -- see below.)
I don't think there is much difference in how Linux vendors and
Microsoft position server and desktop products.
Like I said, Microsoft carefully cripples its NT “Workstation” line to
avoid encroaching on “Server” territory. That way it gets to charge a
whole lot more for the latter.
Around the time of NT 3.51, I think it was, somebody discovered that you
could turn the “Workstation” version into the “Server” version just by
editing a Registry key or two. Microsoft plugged that hole in the next
release.