Sujet : Re: [OT] Languages and the metric system
De : davef (at) *nospam* tsoft-inc.com (Dave Froble)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 29. Aug 2024, 02:45:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vaojsp$3meco$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 8/28/2024 1:42 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:
On 2024-08-28, John Dallman <jgd@cix.co.uk> wrote:
In article <van4uj$3fdl0$1@dont-email.me>,
clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP (Simon Clubley) wrote:
>
For the record, I think it would be nice if the UK finally
completed the transition to purely metric for everything.
>
Our recently ex-government held a consultation on reverting to Imperial
units for some consumer purposes. The response was very negative and the
idea was quietly abandoned.
>
>
I saw that and it was a very nice thing to see it was so strongly rejected.
>
With one major exception (see below[*]), long distances are still in
miles, but smaller distances tend to be purely metric. For example, it is
considered _very_ old fashioned by the people I interact with to say
a few yards instead of a few metres.
>
[*] That major exception are the Ordnance Survey maps. In a remarkable
piece of foresight very uncommon in this country, the OS finished the
conversion of all maps from imperial to metric units decades ago.
>
All OS maps today are purely metric. The OS coordinate system is also
purely metric and is _very_ nice to work with.
Then I'd get lost rather quickly ...
But, some consider me lost now ...
:-)
-- David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef@tsoft-inc.comDFE Ultralights, Inc.170 Grimplin RoadVanderbilt, PA 15486