Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On 9/3/24 2:59 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:Why? Wasn't the VMS Pascal compiler ported? I would think itOn 9/2/2024 7:51 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:It depends on what is meant by "its own development stack." It certainlyOn Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:35:16 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:On PC:>
>
C:\Work\VMS\objectpascal>ppcjvm demo.pas
...
>
On VMS:
>
$ java -cp demo.jar:fpcjvm.jar "demo"
F1=0,F2=
F1=123,F2=ABC
VMS can no longer self-host its own development stack any more.
does self-host the tools used to build the OS itself.There are lots of compilers and interpreters available on VMS.And I think everyone who wasn't trolling recognized that. The JVM
>
There are also a bunch that are not available on VMS. That
bunch include FPC.
>
If someone wanted FPC to run on VMS, then they could
port it. It is open source.
>
FPC has really nothing to do with VMS, but compiling to
Java byte code is a very broad targeting cross compiler.
Which I took advantage of.
brings a big party with it wherever it goes. .NET would bring a
slightly smaller but still nice-to-have party. With LLVM as a
foundation for the current crop of VMS compilers, many things are
possible (but nothing is easy).
Has anyone actually tried porting FPC to VMS? It looks at first glance
like a lot of it is written in Pascal, so I assume it would need to be
cross-compiled initially.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.