Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On 9/6/2024 8:19 PM, Dave Froble wrote:Still, someone has to mention it.On 9/4/2024 3:29 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:>On 9/3/2024 10:48 PM, Dave Froble wrote:>On 9/3/2024 2:02 PM, Simon Clubley wrote:>On 2024-09-03, Dave Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> wrote:>As for VMS and Pascal, there is a very decent implementation of that>
language on
VMS, so what's the problem when a product aimed at a different environment
will
not run on every environment.
So how capable are the OO features in VMS Pascal these days ?
You state that similar to my comment above, as if it is a given that OO is
necessary. Perhaps not. Cheap way to avoid my question.
If you write OS kernel or an embedded application for a device counting
memory in KB (or maybe a few MB): it is not necessary.
Ok, your word, "necessary".
>
Explain to me why OO is necessary ...
>
Not that it may be useful, or desired. You wrote "necessary".
>
>
Dave, you're wasting your time. The COBOL world asked that
question and look what they did to them. :-)
>
bill
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.