Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:44:14 -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote:They have one big advantage over fork on VMS.Whoever invented the term apparently thought fork() was the onlyIt is the most natural way in this case, because it creates a complete
way to create a subprocess.
copy of the parent process, which is what you want.
On VMS it will obviously use LIB$SPAWN or SYS$CREPRC.Not only is that more expensive, it also requires additional setup to
recreate the effect of fork(2).
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.