Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On 9/28/24 4:33 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:I consider SQLServer a very nice database. I love the ability toOn Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:26:51 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:Saying SQL Server is a poor choice for anything based on one story aboutOn 9/28/2024 1:08 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 22:18:39 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:>SQLServer is used at a few high volume places like MS own Office 365>
web and StackExchange.
I wonder if it was used as part of that London Stock Exchange system
that imploded so spectacularly?
The TradElect system used by London Stock Exchange 2007-2011 (which was
not a success) used SQLServer 2000 as database.
Not exactly a recommendation for mission-critical use, is it?
SQL 2000 is like saying you should never use a web browser because
Netscape 1.0 had its problems. In the last 20+ years, Microsoft has
made massive investments in improving SQL Server's performance and
scalability, has ported it to Linux, and has added boatloads of new
features. Whether it would be first choice for a trading system I don't
know, but as Arne said, they run quite a bit of their own mission
critical stuff on it.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.