Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:02:59 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:It is still an option on Linux.On 9/29/2024 7:43 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:No need. Threading inherently opens its own can of worms, which is why itOn Sun, 29 Sep 2024 19:16:48 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:>On 9/29/2024 6:57 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 10:46:12 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:>That is not how Apache prefork MPM works.>
If that’s not how it works, then how can you serve a client from more
than one member of the worker pool?
A new request on a new connection goes to another worker. No problem.
But with keepalive, the request will come in on the existing
connection. So you have to dedicate a worker process to each
connection? That’s inefficient.
There is a reason that prefork MPM has been replaced by other MPM's.
is useful to keep the option of running multiple single-threaded
processes.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.