Liste des Groupes | Revenir à co vms |
On 10/2/2024 9:18 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:And if you don't like RMS?On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 20:51:54 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:>On 10/2/2024 8:44 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>The C runtime can wrap it in the same sort of thing it does for any>
other channel.
It would have to reimplement a lot of RMS functionality to be able to
properly work with VMS files in an efficient manner.
I don’t see why RMS needs to come into it at all. RMS seems like a poor
fit for the whole stdio/POSIX I/O model.
Process A creates a text file and start writing to it, process A send
the channel to process B, process B want to write more data to it.
>
B send "ABC\n" to wrapper.
>
What does the wrapper write to disk?
>
RFM=STMLF : 0x41 0x42 0x43 0x0A
RFM=VAR : 0x03 0x00 0x41 0x42 0x43 0x00
RFM=VFC : ...
RFM=FIX MRS=512 : ...
>
And that is just for sequential files. We also got index-sequential
and relative files.
>
Yes - C IO and RMS IO are not easy to align, but we have RMS whether we like it
or no.
>
Arne
>
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.