Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 17. Oct 2024, 00:00:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vepghu$2e4fp$10@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:44:44 -0400, Arne Vajhøj wrote:

procedure eve_all_replace(fndstr,rplstr)
local fnd_string,
       rpl_string, pos_mark, count_integer;
if not (eve$prompt_string(fndstr,fnd_string,"Old string: ",
                           "No old string given")) then
     return;

When DEC introduced TPU/EVE, I raised my arms to the heavens in joy at
finally being liberated from the suffering that was EDT. (Hate EDT. Hate,
hate, hate.)

Then I left it behind with VMS ... and a few decades later, finally found
the time to get to grips with Emacs.

In Emacs/ELisp, there is the distinction between a “function” (what TPU
would call a “procedure”, I guess) and a “command”. A “function” only
becomes a “command” when you insert the “(interactive ...)” directive near
its start. This is a declarative construct that supplies the information
Emacs uses to obtain the right arguments for the function automatically,
including prompting the user as necessary, so your code doesn’t have to.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Oct 24 * Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?20Brian Schenkenberger
15 Oct 24 +- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1mjos_examine
15 Oct 24 `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?18John Dallman
15 Oct 24  `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?17Brian Schenkenberger
15 Oct 24   +- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1mjos_examine
15 Oct 24   +* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?13Arne Vajhøj
15 Oct 24   i+- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1Arne Vajhøj
16 Oct 24   i`* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?11Arne Vajhøj
16 Oct 24   i `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?10Arne Vajhøj
17 Oct 24   i  +* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Oct 24   i  i+* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?4Arne Vajhøj
17 Oct 24   i  ii`* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Oct 24   i  ii `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?2Arne Vajhøj
17 Oct 24   i  ii  `- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Oct 24   i  i`- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?1Arne Vajhøj
17 Oct 24   i  `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?3Craig A. Berry
17 Oct 24   i   `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?2Arne Vajhøj
18 Oct 24   i    `- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1Arne Vajhøj
16 Oct 24   +- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1Craig A. Berry
16 Oct 24   `- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1Mark Berryman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal