Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à co vms 
Sujet : Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?
De : arne (at) *nospam* vajhoej.dk (Arne Vajhøj)
Groupes : comp.os.vms
Date : 18. Oct 2024, 14:36:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
Message-ID : <67126452$0$708$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/16/2024 10:13 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
On 10/16/2024 9:34 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote:
On 10/16/24 5:44 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
On 10/15/2024 7:48 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
$ type bc.eve
all replace "#include ""b/" "#include ""c/"
exit
>
$ type cd.tpu
eve_all_replace("#include ""c/", "#include ""d/");
eve_exit();
>
Just realized that one is custom not standard.
 
procedure eve_all_replace(fndstr,rplstr)
 
eve_all_replace may be custom, but as far as I know eve_global_replace is standard.
 Yes - it is.
 I wonder why I have that eve_all_replace.
There are a small difference in prompt behavior (all replace does
not prompt if I want to go to start and repeat). But that is
pretty subtle. The implementation is very different. eve_global_replace
calls eve_replace with a global variable set to change its behavior.
Maybe eve_global_replace was added with the major EVE rewrite in 5.0
and I kept eve_all_replace when I rewrote from 4.x to 5.x.
Anybody that has a VMS 4.x system and could do:
$ sear sys$examples:eve$edit.tpu eve_global_replace
?
Arne

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Oct 24 * Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?20Brian Schenkenberger
15 Oct 24 +- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1mjos_examine
15 Oct 24 `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?18John Dallman
15 Oct 24  `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?17Brian Schenkenberger
15 Oct 24   +- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1mjos_examine
15 Oct 24   +* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?13Arne Vajhøj
15 Oct 24   i+- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1Arne Vajhøj
16 Oct 24   i`* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?11Arne Vajhøj
16 Oct 24   i `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?10Arne Vajhøj
17 Oct 24   i  +* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Oct 24   i  i+* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?4Arne Vajhøj
17 Oct 24   i  ii`* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Oct 24   i  ii `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?2Arne Vajhøj
17 Oct 24   i  ii  `- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Oct 24   i  i`- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work on VMS?1Arne Vajhøj
17 Oct 24   i  `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?3Craig A. Berry
17 Oct 24   i   `* Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?2Arne Vajhøj
18 Oct 24   i    `- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1Arne Vajhøj
16 Oct 24   +- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1Craig A. Berry
16 Oct 24   `- Re: Can C #includes like this be made to work onVMS?1Mark Berryman

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal